Previous Entry Share
Two Problems with Normandy
sanctuary. helen/nikola. {emily_reich}
palmaceae wrote in dear_damian

I came away from Normandy cold. Now, to be fair it could be attributed to the fact that I was under stress and not feeling so great at the moment, but I also think that while it was nice for once to see a story that actually did move, it moved too fast sometimes. I found myself yearning for a lingering shot here or there for emotional impact. The episode will probably get better upon my second viewing and it was definitely better than the last couple of episodes. But the two biggest problems for me are ones that will not change upon obsessive rewatches: John's removal and Nikola's isolation.

1) Helen is captured, they drag her into the room where John and James are being held. They shoot John and drag him out. John's had his scene with James, Helen's had two seconds on screen with John, and leaving the three of them together locked in the room would have been fantastic. Not having John and Helen interact was a huge missing piece for me. Especially with Helen both angry and worried about John at the same time, as demonstrated by her gasp when he was shot. I would have loved to see them working together, not John showing up at the last second to save the day. This is not the first time I've been pissed off by John's sudden removal from screen only for him to return at the last second to save the day - it happened as well in Pax Romana and it was a pretty poor move on... oh what a surprise, Damian Kindler's (who also wrote Normandy) part. Unless these disappearances are due to Heyerdahl having time issues and not being able to be part of the filming, I find them problematic, a lame fix it for the story and a waste of Heyerdahl's talent.

2) Nikola's isolation. Nikola spends the entire episode isolated from the rest of The Five both geographically and plot-wise. If they had cut all of Nikola's scenes, it wouldn't have made much of a difference in terms of plot - he spent the whole time pacing the room basically. Again, Nikola's isolation may be due to time restrictions on the part of Jonathon Young. Even if that is true, there's no reason why Nikola couldn't have been a more integral part of the plot. Why wasn't he allowed to meet with Eisenhower at the very least? Why didn't they have Eisenhower on the show talking to Nikola, which would have been cool? Fire elemental, blah blah I understand why they needed to use an abnormal - the show *is* about abnormals - but what about Nikola being kidnapped by the Nazis in order to build a machine to contain this fire elemental? He could have spent that time pacing yet another room alone with just one character if necessary. Also, *if* I remember correctly, didn't real!Tesla make claims that he could invent something to control the weather? Four of the Five reuniting once again to rescue one of their own in addition to saving the world (so to speak) and disabling the fire elemental would have been more emotionally compelling than just the world saving and fire elemental.

It's always like this though - give the show a relatively good idea and they will never quite manage to take it to the emotional and plotty heights they can go.

Side note: who totally thinks that the French Resistance lady is going to turn out to be Nigel's wife later? IDK, maybe?

  • 1
The thing is, I think the Helen and John interactions had to be the way they were and as little as they were due to canon constrictions. The way I read their relationship in the first episode, they have barely seen each other since she found out John was the Ripper. Otherwise, the pain wouldn't be so fresh. They interact like two people who have barely seen each other in a long time. So, while I would have loved more interactions, it would have felt wrong to me.

As for Nikola, I do kind of agree with you. I wish he had been part of the action. I adore him. And it wouldn't have felt wrong with him the way it would have with John.

The biggest thing that bugged me was having Robin Dunne play will's ancestor. WTF? I hate when shows do that. Why not have another actor play the part. It would have made a whole lot more sense. I didn't mind the character existing, but just having the name would have been enough. Generally, people don't look exactly like their ancestors. Genetics doesn't work that way. They look like their own unique person who may be very similar to an ancestor, but only rarely do they look close enough to be mistaken for each other.

The way I read their relationship in the first episode, they have barely seen each other since she found out John was the Ripper. I haven't read it that way, especially considering For King and Country, we don't know how much time they spent together during that event. And we have currently two different points in history where they ran into each other, I think there were probably more. Otherwise, the pain wouldn't be so fresh, I'm like, if they HAVEN'T seen each other, then the pain would have dulled, but the fact that they keep on seeing each other is what keeps the pain alive and well.

The biggest thing that bugged me was having Robin Dunne play will's ancestor that kind of thing usually doesn't bug me... except that it was Will, so it really really bugged me.

  • 1
?

Log in

No account? Create an account